An Ontario first industrial strategy starts with a simple political truth: rules about where trains are built decide where kids eat dinner, which cities grow, and which towns are told they are expendable.
In 2020, the Ford government weakened Canadian content rules while workers were being reassured that strong protections were in place. A Freedom of Information process later showed those protections being chipped away while a $9‑billion contract went to Hitachi to build Ontario vehicles in the United States. What was sold as a one‑off exception instead signalled a new pattern.
Canadian content requirements on Ontario Line vehicles were reduced, then removed completely for the GO Expansion project. For Thunder Bay Alstom workers, that did not read as neutral procurement. It read as a political decision that their community could be sidelined without an honest debate.
Here is the factual base behind this perspective. Government documents released in February 2026 showed deliberate weakening of Canadian content rules that had been publicly described as robust. The Hitachi contract was worth billions and located production outside Canada. Canadian content was cut on one major transit project and eliminated on another. The public record captures these shifts, while the broader analysis here comes from how these choices land in real Ontario communities.
What many political leaders miss is that industrial strategy is not just about cost per railcar. It is about whether people in Thunder Bay, Hamilton, Windsor or Scarborough believe their own government will fight for Ontario manufacturing when it actually counts. Secrecy destroys that belief. Clear rules rebuild it.
A modern Ontario first industrial strategy would lock in meaningful Canadian content rules for major transit and infrastructure projects, tie them to transparent reporting, and treat plants like Thunder Bay Alstom as long‑term partners instead of convenient talking points. That approach would not guarantee every contract, but it would guarantee a fair fight on home soil.
The evidence here rests mainly on released documents and public contracts, so these recommendations are a starting point for testing and public debate, not a final script. The political choice now sits with Ontarians: accept quiet erosion of Ontario manufacturing, or demand leadership that openly backs Ontario first industrial strategy, honest Canadian content rules, and real work for plants from Thunder Bay to the GTA.
If you haven't already, be sure to sign up for my newsletter.
