Predatory pricing uses personal data to decide who pays what. Browsing history, location, and past purchases are harvested, then turned into customized prices that often charge more to those with fewer choices. Major retailers, apps, and online platforms already deploy these tactics, while Ontario has yet to draw a clear legal line.
Digital dignity means that people are treated as citizens, not as data points to be squeezed. For a province that claims to care about affordability, it is not enough to lament grocery bills while ignoring the digital machinery that quietly inflates them. When government refuses to ban predatory pricing, it effectively grants permission for corporations to keep experimenting on household budgets.
A legislative framework for Ontario can rest on three pillars. First, consumer data protection: personal information collected for service delivery must not be repurposed for price discrimination without explicit, informed consent. Second, algorithmic fairness: companies that set prices with automated systems should be required to test, document, and publicly explain how those systems avoid targeting people based on income, neighbourhood, or vulnerability. Third, price transparency: if two Ontarians are shown different prices for the same good or service, they should have the right to know why and to challenge it.
This paragraph summarizes the practical evidence base for that framework:
Predatory pricing already relies on tracking browsing history, location, and purchasing behaviour to set individualized prices.
It is appearing in everyday spaces such as grocery shopping, fuel purchases, and online orders, where people cannot realistically opt out.
The current provincial government voted against a straightforward proposal to ban this practice, leaving no specific rules in place.
In practice, this hands more power to large digital platforms than to the Ontarians who fund those profits every time they tap “checkout”.
The argument here is that a rights-based framework would rebalance that power toward residents and local communities.
There are two important truths that many leaders miss. Predatory pricing does not just raise costs, it quietly punishes people who lack time, digital literacy, or multiple devices to comparison shop. It also tilts the playing field against small businesses that post one honest price, while global platforms silently adjust prices by the second.
Ontarians face a choice. Either prices for essentials are treated as a fair, common standard, or they are left to opaque systems that reward whoever can collect and exploit the most data. A government serious about affordability, opportunity, and respect for its residents would outlaw predatory pricing, embed consumer data protection and algorithmic fairness in law, and invite community advocates, students, and small businesses to help shape the details.
The path to digital dignity in Ontario will not be written by algorithms. It will be written by people who insist that technology serve the public, not prey on it, and who stay engaged long enough to turn that insistence into law.
If you haven't yet signed up for my bi-weekly Red Thread newsletter SUBSCRIBE.
This article was created by a human editor and an AI-assisted workflow by Draiper Inc.
